R.I.P.

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

I believe he did say not to use that fake pic "of you in the blue panties" that you claim looks like or is you.

Whatever you say.

Quote:

Because you PMed Jeff and cried about me using it as my avatar.

Whatever you say.

Quote:

ADDED: Please find the post of Tony making this proclamation.

So you're detective abilities are low today or you just want me to keep on bumping this post bringing new life to the forum you moderate? (Click)

Reged: 05/17/07
Posts: 910
Loc: The O.C.D.
Re: Jeff Steward
#382150 - 01/28/09 03:06 AM Edit Reply Quote

Let me guess...

Is it redgoat using that picture that's supposedly your ass as an avatar that has your blue panties in a bind?

Reged: 04/14/03
Posts: 7093
Loc: JM Productions
Re: Jeff Steward

#382317 - 01/28/09 01:09 PM Edit Reply Quote

.

Redgoat is using my picture as his avatar.

From: Darrah

Could you tell him to take it down? Thank you.

Whatever you say.

"It's not me. If it was, it would be deleted by now."--Keep believing that.

BTW--You stopped mentioning Jenna , didn't you???

============================

Who was registered 2007?

It was very rare that Jeff replied back to me on anything. I asked Tony about most of those things.

Quote:

Keep believing that.

I do believe it and it would be deleted.

Quote:

BTW--You stopped mentioning Jenna , didn't you???

I am the only porn site that regularly talked about her good or bad. So if she has a problem, then I won't give the media hungry celebrity anymore press. I did recently post a links post, which you went giving to her on Twitter ten or more times which she never replied back to you, because there was a video and pictures I wanted to post that would get me good traffic.

Go choke on your cum asshole and keep on dreaming about me.

You're a moderator on a porn forum where the owner was targeted by the government. If you believe in freedom of speech, then why have you done nothing but trying to get me sued? Because I won't talk to you or be friendly with you anymore like I used to? If you were actually human and didn't have the split personalities that you do, then I would be friendly with you. So stop with your faux friendship and trying to get me to be a moderator. You're full of shit as usual and it's just another one of your many games. Goodbye.

Posted by: Anonymous

Re: R.I.P. - 05/15/10 09:03 PM

None have ever produced such a vehement, instantaneous reaction. I think this one hits a little too close to home.

Posted by: Mark_J

Re: R.I.P. - 05/15/10 09:45 PM

i'm convinced the pic is her because i've been chatting her up on facebook for like a month and a half.
her reactions on there are near identical- combative, angry, denies that happiness is open as an option, won't give me her phone #.

some definite underdog-lady type neuroses going on, and we need to get to the bottom of it.
frantic, foaming at the mouth posts like THIS are a cry for help.

Posted by: Darrah Ford's ghost

Re: R.I.P. - 05/15/10 10:04 PM

Quote:

i'm convinced the pic is her because i've been chatting her up on facebook for like a month and a half.
her reactions on there are near identical- combative, angry, denies that happiness is open as an option,
won't give me her phone #.

some definite underdog-lady type neuroses going on, and we need to get to the bottom of it. as i see it, frantic foaming at the mouth posts like THIS are a cry for help.

Huh? Well my account was banned there. So I don't know who you're talking to but it's not me and never was.

I'm reacting this way because you bastards treated the last underage girl badly and now you're starting on this one.

And I'm not a blonde.

Posted by: Darrah Ford's ghost

Re: R.I.P. - 05/15/10 10:07 PM

And wouldn't that picture be down by now if it was really me? THINK, but I know that's hard for many of you.

Tony did put up a post once telling all of you to never put my pictures up again.

Posted by: Anonymous

Re: R.I.P. - 05/15/10 10:12 PM

Quote:

Tony did put up a post once telling all of you to never put my pictures up again.

I forget, was this before or after you started attacking his boss? Hell, I'd be surprised if you could remember either.

Underage. Sure Durfah.

Posted by: Anonymous

Re: R.I.P. - 05/15/10 10:16 PM

Quote:

you bastards treated the last underage girl badly

You mean the chick you harassed into hysterics? With a memory like that, no wonder you look so smug. Looking like you've never ever done one wrong thing...

Posted by: Darrah Ford's ghost

Re: R.I.P. - 05/15/10 10:49 PM

It was three months ago.

Quote:

You mean the chick you harassed into hysterics?

ONCE AGAIN, she contacted me on Twitter. I didn't know how old she was. I later found out how a certain someone here somehow followed Desi to that girl's blog. Then a group of people here started harassing the girl. Tony then banned any talk about that girl here again.

Posted by: Anonymous

Re: R.I.P. - 05/16/10 07:42 AM

Quote:

Tony then banned any talk about that girl here again.

Then why did you bring it up?

Quote:

I'm reacting this way because you bastards treated the last underage girl badly and now you're starting on this one.

Posted by: ivorenginedriver

Re: R.I.P. - 05/16/10 10:40 AM

Dearest Darrah. One who dishes it out ought not to go crying to the site's owner that she can't take it. Hasn't Porn Star Babylon vaulted you into the status of public figure? One can't relinquish one's privacy cake to become the Doyenne of PSB and still expect to eat a slice whenver she wants without appearing to be a bit of a crybaby.

Posted by: LouCypher

Re: R.I.P. - 05/16/10 10:55 AM

I love her. I want her to be someone here. Darrah for mod..ASAP.

Posted by: the unknown pervert

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 02:59 AM

Quote:

every story needs a bad guy. Derp is needed here.

If this is the real McCoy someone with better photoshopping/paint skills than me needs to flip this picture upside down X out the eyes and add a trifecta of quags underneath it.

Posted by: Anonymous

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 05:40 AM

Posted by: Darrah Ford's ghost

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 04:51 PM

Quote:

I believe he did say not to use that fake pic "of you in the blue panties" that you claim looks like or is you.

Whatever you say.

Quote:

Because you PMed Jeff and cried about me using it as my avatar.

Whatever you say.

Quote:

ADDED: Please find the post of Tony making this proclamation.

So you're detective abilities are low today or you just want me to keep on bumping this post bringing new life to the forum you moderate? (Click)

Posted by: Darrah Ford's ghost

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 04:53 PM

Quote:

Then why did you bring it up?

I brought it up so to explain this case. I didn't mention her name, post her picture, where she lives, or where to find her online like you people did.

Posted by: Darrah Ford's ghost

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 04:54 PM

Quote:

Dearest Darrah. One who dishes it out ought not to go crying to the site's owner that she can't take it. Hasn't Porn Star Babylon vaulted you into the status of public figure? One can't relinquish one's privacy cake to become the Doyenne of PSB and still expect to eat a slice whenver she wants without appearing to be a bit of a crybaby.

I am not a public figure and have never been one. If so, that means the thousands and thousands of other bloggers from around the world would also be public figures. I am not in the public eye and make no money from my blog.

Posted by: Darrah Ford's ghost

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 04:56 PM

Quote:

I love her. I want her to be someone here. Darrah for mod..ASAP.

Will never happen. Think about it.

Posted by: Darrah Ford's ghost

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 04:57 PM

Quote:

She has my vote.

Really, why? You send Jenna Jameson's lawyer to my blog but you want me to be a moderator here now?

Posted by: Darrah Ford's ghost

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 05:25 PM

Quote:

Why would you discuss porn with a 15 year old child?

I didn't discuss porn with her. Most of our discussions revolved around me trying to help her with the harassment she was getting from the people on here. Why did you follow Desi to a child's personal blog?

Posted by: Darrah Ford's ghost

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 05:27 PM

Keep on showing all these screencaps you have saved on me. It shows everyone here how pathetic and disturbed you are.

Posted by: †††

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 05:31 PM

Posted by: Bornyo

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 05:40 PM

I'll be your friend Darrah... hit me up.

Posted by: Darrah Ford's ghost

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 05:42 PM

Quote:

Like I wanted you to be a moderator...
Just replied to suck you in..As usual, it worked.

Of course I didn't believe you. Where did you get that from? Are we reading the same thing here? Just like how I never believed Willie. You didn't suck me in because I knew you were lying like most everything else.

Quote:

Yeah, NOBODY ever covers Jenna Jameson. Just you.
Do you have 2257 records for your porn site?

In porn, I'm the one who covered her the most.

I don't need those records. I don't produce porn and I don't show porn scenes.

The stalker is you. I blog about an industry while you start multiple blogs about solely based on me. Keep on admitting to everyone that you're a stalker because that's what you just did. And stop harassing jenna Jameson and her friends when her friends have already asked you why are you sending them these things.

Posted by: Anonymous

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 07:54 PM

Quote:

This Darrah Ford needs to be violently sodomized about the buttocks.

Fixed

Posted by: Darrah Ford's ghost

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 08:02 PM

Quote:

Quote:

This Darrah Ford needs to be violently sodomized about the buttocks.

Fixed

And what did I ever do to you Jim?

Posted by: Jigaloo

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 08:04 PM

You were born you stupid twat.

Posted by: Snowman

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 10:04 PM

Quote:

Hi, Sorry to be over a year late responding to this. But I have covered the adult industry for Rolling Stone, LA Times, Las Vegas Weekly and The Daily Beast. My primary connection to adult is the AEE convention and AVN Awards in Vegas, where I am based. I don’t watch movies, mainstream or porn. That is why I have never seen an adult film yet write about the industry frequently. After more than a decade at the convention reporting annually, I feel qualified. People get what is in the films and so it is a unique industry where I don’t really need to see the films to write about the people, practices and business.

My comment on Darrah's blog was actually referring to Richard Abowitz's statements above. I just don't agree that one is truly qualified to write about the adult industry if they have never seen a XXX movie. It would be desirable for a porn journalist to view as many pornographic movies as possible. I think this is just common sense and it's absurd to suggest otherwise.

I always assumed that Darrah did watch porn. I know she is not an "industry insider" but I certainly thought she watched adult movies. If this is the thing she "has in common" with Richard Abowitz, I am very disappointed. The title of her blog entry was a little unclear to me.

Posted by: Darrah Ford's ghost

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 10:30 PM

Quote:

My comment on Darrah's blog was actually referring to Richard Abowitz's statements above. I just don't agree that one is truly qualified to write about the adult industry if they have never seen a XXX movie. It would be desirable for a porn journalist to view as many pornographic movies as possible. I think this is just common sense and it's absurd to suggest otherwise.

I always assumed that Darrah did watch porn. I know she is not an "industry insider" but I certainly thought she watched adult movies. If this is the thing she "has in common" with Richard Abowitz, I am very disappointed. The title of her blog entry was a little unclear to me.

Oh I watched A LOT of porn before I started my blog. I would find a lot of the porn out there tame that I would then go to a tube site (SORRY) and type in extreme to find something that wasn't boring. Nothing horrific or anything. Extreme sounds bad but porn that wasn't like Vivid porn. I used to prefer Vivid porn because at least I knew there wouldn't be any surprises and nothing diabolical happening. But after I started the blog, I became disgusted by what I found out about the reality of the industry and what many women go through. So then I stopped watching porn. Now I check out the tube sites (SORRY) or the links I get sent in press releases to check out a scene of any new girl out there so I can see what she's all about.

Posted by: Fiend

Re: R.I.P. - 05/18/10 12:45 AM

SO you got desensitized to porn and then in order to get off on it you needed to speak out against it so you can watch it again and get your jollies from being a hypocrite?

Posted by: Blink

Re: R.I.P. - 05/18/10 02:22 AM

Fiend, you should familiarize yourself with the concept of the ad hominem logical fallacy. Truth is not determined by who is saying it, but by what they are saying.

Note that I'm not taking sides here. This isn't my battle. I once thought that it was, but truly it is not. If the porn industry is doing things that it shouldn't be doing, then that must be handled by the proper authorities. For reasons unknown, those authorities have turned a blind eye towards the porn industry. Perhaps if enough people make enough of a fuss, that might change, but I am very doubtful. I deeply believe that those in power very much like things the way they are. Porn is a wonderful distraction (one amongst many more), and people will fight, viciously and unceasingly, for their right to view it. And those same people will, at the same time and with nary a protest, allow their own government to take their freedoms away and completely destroy everything that their once-proud country stood for.

Darrah, if you want to improve things, you should widen your focus. If the situation in the porn industry is as awful as you and I believe it to be, then you should ask yourself why this is allowed to continue. You certainly won't find answers here, merely speculation. You probably won't find allies here, either. I know that I'm wasting my time here, and I accept that. I'm done fighting for others; they must learn how to stand up for themselves, or they'll continue to be milked for everything that they have and then tossed aside when they're no longer useful.

Posted by: ivorenginedriver

Re: R.I.P. - 05/18/10 10:17 AM

Blink wants to be the Big Nurse to the porn whores. The fact is that PWs know, or ought to know, what they are getting into. Some PWs such as Nina Hartley, Lisa Sparxxx, Lisa Ann, Tia Ling, Cameron Keys, Gia Jordan and many others use porn valley for their benefit, and others piss away their money and leave with nothing. That's life. Empowering the Government to nail the porn industry would create a precedent that could lead to attempts to censor the internet a la Communist China.

To Darrah; As a functional manner you waive some deal of your privacy by virtue of your high profile with respect to porn. Again, that's life.

Posted by: Blink

Re: R.I.P. - 05/18/10 12:08 PM

Quote:

The fact is that PWs know, or ought to know, what they are getting into.

Whether they know what they're getting into or not, that doesn't excuse treatment that may cross the line into criminal territory. And no, I won't go into details about that because I'm neither an insider nor a lawyer. If such treatment is occurring, it's not my responsibility to do anything about that.

Quote:

Empowering the Government to nail the porn industry would create a precedent that could lead to attempts to censor the internet a la Communist China.

You haven't heard about obscenity prosecution, I take it? The effort to censor porn is already under way, and it looks as if the porn industry is losing right now. However, that's not what I am getting at. Porn should not be censored. It should, however, follow legal safety standards.

That's all that I'm going to say about this now. I spent a very great deal of time and effort going into details about this topic elsewhere, such as at ADT. I left the FreeOnes forums and I returned here to talk about anything but the porn industry's problems.

Posted by: ivorenginedriver

Re: R.I.P. - 05/18/10 12:25 PM

With respect to legal safety standards, perhaps you are referring to condom usage? Consumer taste drives condomless porn and attempts to zealously regulate against condomless porn is likely to result in porn being produced by even shadier producers in order to satisfy the market since porn is an inherently "mobile" industry.

Posted by: Blink

Re: R.I.P. - 05/18/10 12:37 PM

http://forum.adultdvdtalk.com/forum/topic.dlt/topic_id=114374/forum_id=1/cat_id=1/reply=1266864#post1266864

http://board.freeones.com/showpost.php?p=2015021

Posted by: Fiend

Re: R.I.P. - 05/18/10 02:02 PM

Quote:

Truth is not determined by who is saying it, but by what they are saying

"Truth" is a lie.

Posted by: Anonymous

Re: R.I.P. - 05/18/10 04:07 PM

^^^ So is this:

Quote:

I returned here to talk about anything but the porn industry's problems.

Posted by: Darrah Ford's ghost

Re: R.I.P. - 05/18/10 05:11 PM

Quote:

To Darrah; As a functional manner you waive some deal of your privacy by virtue of your high profile with respect to porn. Again, that's life.

I'm high profile?

Posted by: Darrah Ford's ghost

Re: R.I.P. - 05/18/10 05:12 PM

Quote:

SO you got desensitized to porn and then in order to get off on it you needed to speak out against it so you can watch it again and get your jollies from being a hypocrite?

My ip address is 75.67.16.140

Posted by: Fuk Yo Mama

Re: R.I.P. - 05/18/10 05:46 PM

Darrah,

All I really want to know is the following:

What do you think about when you masturbate? Memories, fantasies, old boyfriends, porn?

How old were you the first time you tried anal? When was the last time you took it in the bum?

How many times a week do you have sex?

And lastly, when you are on your back being pounded by some guy and he's about to blow and he pulls it out just before he's about to pop do you grab it and jerk him off til he finishes or are you a cum dodger?

Answering these questions in great detail will only do you good.

Posted by: Claude Goddard

Re: R.I.P. - 05/23/10 02:44 AM

Quote:

Nice tits, and I'm not even a tit man.

Posted by: mallocup

Re: R.I.P. - 05/25/10 08:09 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Truth is not determined by who is saying it, but by what they are saying

"Truth" is a lie.

the truth is lies agreed upon. well, history is anyway..

are they really darrah's boobies?

Posted by: Blink

Re: R.I.P. - 05/25/10 01:31 PM

Quote:

http://board.freeones.com/showpost.php?p=2015021

If you're wondering where my evidence is for what I stated in that post, it's in two posts that I made earlier in that same thread: here and here.

Despite what people may believe, I was being honest when I wrote that I didn't come back here to talk about the porn industry's problems. I spent entirely too much time talking about this topic at FreeOnes (obviously). I spent even more time foolishly crusading at ADT and I made things worse. At this point, I'm beyond caring about what effects my posts might have. There's more to life than worrying about that.

Posted by: tattypatty

Re: R.I.P. - 05/25/10 11:06 PM

Quote:

Anecdotes:

That word is not interchangeable with 'data'.

Posted by: Blink

Re: R.I.P. - 05/26/10 12:54 AM

Whether people believe that this is a serious issue or not is immaterial. If it is, then the porn industry is looking at some major legal action that will make obscenity prosecution look tame by comparison. If it's not, then nothing will happen.

Posted by: †††

Re: R.I.P. - 05/26/10 04:24 PM

:blink1:

:blink2:

:blink1&2:

Posted by: Blink

Re: R.I.P. - 05/26/10 04:41 PM

^ Mmmkay.

Posted by: Blink

Re: R.I.P. - 05/27/10 01:11 PM

Okay, this is my last post in this thread (and hopefully the last one about this topic). For the record, there is evidence that anal sex causes problems for a significant number of people who engage in it. But there is simply no question that the style of anal sex commonly found in porn causes problems (rough penile penetration with plenty of friction). Stuff such as "anal destruction" and "painful anal" are even out there, not to mention other extreme activities such as large anal insertions and rectal prolapse play.

By the way, "under California law, criminal negligence is only concerned with the act itself, not with the consequences." The possibility that "Great Bodily Injury" could occur must be established. California's definition of GBI is: "a significant or substantial physical injury." (edit: alt source) I don't know which physical risks of anal sex might constitute GBI; I'm not a lawyer.

See this* or alternatively, this for the physical risks of anal sex. Several of the quotes have data on how common certain problems are amongst those who engage in anal sex. One notes that, due to the fact that the rectal mucosa is delicate, anal sex is "likely to cause some degree of trauma."

* That site is unmaintained and I haven't touched it for almost a year. It's amazing that it's still up on a free host.

Posted by: cqd

Re: R.I.P. - 05/27/10 02:41 PM

I'm too lazy to quote it but I can probably find it...

Didn't you claim to be done with your "agenda"?

You should look over your archives and refile links about the risks of doing anal under "shit that nobody cares about".

Posted by: Bornyo

Re: R.I.P. - 05/27/10 09:16 PM

Not only that, his "data" is still anecdotal. It's a lost cause. I think his father's older brother anally raped him without lube as a child, then, when he ballooned to 300lbs and developed hemorrhoids he blames his 20 yr ago ass-rape.

Blink, dude, lose the weight and add some fiber to your diet.

R.I.P.

R.I.P. - 05/14/10 12:59 AM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/14/10 03:20 AM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/14/10 06:48 AM

Re: R.I.P. *DELETED* *DELETED* *DELETED* *DELETED* *DELETED* - 05/14/10 07:06 AM

Re: R.I.P. *DELETED* *DELETED* *DELETED* *DELETED* *DELETED* - 05/14/10 10:48 AM

Re: R.I.P. *DELETED* *DELETED* *DELETED* *DELETED* *DELETED* - 05/14/10 01:03 PM

Re: R.I.P. *DELETED* *DELETED* *DELETED* *DELETED* *DELETED* - 05/14/10 02:27 PM

Re: R.I.P. *DELETED* *DELETED* *DELETED* *DELETED* *DELETED* - 05/14/10 05:05 PM

Re: R.I.P. *DELETED* *DELETED* *DELETED* *DELETED* *DELETED* - 05/14/10 05:50 PM

Re: R.I.P. *DELETED* *DELETED* *DELETED* *DELETED* *DELETED* - 05/14/10 06:13 PM

Re: R.I.P. *DELETED* *DELETED* *DELETED* *DELETED* *DELETED* - 05/14/10 06:58 PM

Re: R.I.P. *DELETED* *DELETED* *DELETED* *DELETED* *DELETED* - 05/14/10 06:59 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/14/10 07:45 PM

Re: R.I.P. *DELETED* *DELETED* *DELETED* *DELETED* *DELETED* - 05/14/10 08:09 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/14/10 09:05 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/14/10 09:57 PM

Re: R.I.P. *DELETED* *DELETED* *DELETED* *DELETED* *DELETED* - 05/14/10 10:02 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/15/10 06:39 AM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/15/10 07:01 AM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/15/10 07:12 AM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/15/10 07:56 AM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/15/10 08:18 AM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/15/10 08:38 AM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/15/10 08:42 AM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/15/10 08:21 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/15/10 08:33 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/15/10 08:35 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/15/10 08:46 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/15/10 08:55 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/15/10 09:02 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/15/10 09:03 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/15/10 09:45 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/15/10 10:04 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/15/10 10:07 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/15/10 10:12 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/15/10 10:16 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/15/10 10:49 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/16/10 07:42 AM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/16/10 10:40 AM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/16/10 10:55 AM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 02:59 AM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 05:40 AM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 04:51 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 04:53 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 04:54 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 04:56 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 04:57 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 04:58 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 05:23 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 05:25 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 05:27 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 05:31 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 05:40 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 05:42 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 07:54 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 08:02 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 08:04 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 10:04 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/17/10 10:30 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/18/10 12:45 AM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/18/10 02:22 AM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/18/10 10:17 AM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/18/10 12:08 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/18/10 12:25 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/18/10 12:37 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/18/10 02:02 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/18/10 04:07 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/18/10 05:11 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/18/10 05:12 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/18/10 05:46 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/23/10 02:44 AM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/25/10 08:09 AM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/25/10 01:31 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/25/10 11:06 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/26/10 12:54 AM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/26/10 04:24 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/26/10 04:41 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/27/10 01:11 PM

Re: R.I.P. - 05/27/10 02:41 PM

Re: R.I.P. DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED - 05/14/10 07:06 AM

Re: R.I.P. DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED - 05/14/10 10:48 AM

Re: R.I.P. DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED - 05/14/10 01:03 PM

Re: R.I.P. DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED - 05/14/10 02:27 PM

Re: R.I.P. DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED - 05/14/10 05:05 PM

Re: R.I.P. DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED - 05/14/10 05:50 PM

Re: R.I.P. DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED - 05/14/10 06:13 PM

Re: R.I.P. DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED - 05/14/10 06:58 PM

Re: R.I.P. DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED - 05/14/10 06:59 PM

Re: R.I.P. DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED - 05/14/10 08:09 PM

Re: R.I.P. DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED - 05/14/10 10:02 PM